Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.pediatria.gob.mx:8180/handle/20.500.12103/2405
Título : Guías de Práctica Clínica Basadas en Evidencia, cerrando la brecha entre el conocimiento científico y la toma de decisiones clínicas. Documento de la serie MBE, 3 de 3
Evidence Based Clinical Practice Guidelines, to bridge the gap between science andclinical decision-making. EBM series 3 of 3
Creador: Mayorga Butrón, José Luis
Nivel de acceso: Open access
Palabras clave : Guías de práctica clínica basada en evidenciaMedicina basada en evidenciaRevisiones sistemáticas de la literaturaMeta-análisis
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice GuidelinesEvidence-based medicineSystematic reviewsMeta-analysis
Descripción : Introduction Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendations to assist practitioners, patients and other health professionals in their clinical decisions in order to achieve better healthcare. Material and methods Narrative review. The purpose of this work is to describe the CPGs fundamentals and the steps to develop them. Results CPGs contain recommendations result of a systematic work of a development group integrated by clinical and methodological experts, stakeholder and patients representatives. The protocol includes the scope, a list of clinical structured questions and systematic reviews to find, assess and extract evidence. An expert consensus panel methodology is also considered in order to integrated expertise to the existent scientific evidence. Conclusion CPGs aim is to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and clinical decision-making through clinical recommendations systematically developed. This is the third document of a series of literature review that has been written to aware about the value of CPGs and the importance that clinical oncologists and researchers adopt and develop such documents in our country and worldwide.
Introduction Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) contain recommendations to assist practitioners, patients and other health professionals in their clinical decisions in order to achieve better healthcare. Material and methods Narrative review. The purpose of this work is to describe the CPGs fundamentals and the steps to develop them. Results CPGs contain recommendations result of a systematic work of a development group integrated by clinical and methodological experts, stakeholder and patients representatives. The protocol includes the scope, a list of clinical structured questions and systematic reviews to find, assess and extract evidence. An expert consensus panel methodology is also considered in order to integrated expertise to the existent scientific evidence. Conclusion CPGs aim is to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and clinical decision-making through clinical recommendations systematically developed. This is the third document of a series of literature review that has been written to aware about the value of CPGs and the importance that clinical oncologists and researchers adopt and develop such documents in our country and worldwide.
Colaborador(es) u otros Autores: Liliana Velasco Hidalgo
Francisco Javier Ochoa-Carrillo
Fecha de publicación : 2015
Tipo de publicación: Artículo
Formato: pdf
Identificador del Recurso : 10.1016/j.gamo.2015.12.005
Fuente: Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología 14(6):329 - 334
URI : http://repositorio.pediatria.gob.mx:8180/handle/20.500.12103/2405
Idioma: eng
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.